
JPEG's are the most convenient optionx for sure. you can share your information instantly, smaller files and you don't take up as much space on your memory card or disc file. "to achieve this small size, however, JPEG's have to be compressed in-camera, and some picture information has to be discarded in the process. Raw pictures, on the other hand, are uncompressed, and this means they're big files - your memory cards will fill up faster, and the photo take longer to transfer form the camera;s buffer to the card, too... however, we still recommend shooting Raw in a wide range of circumstances. the bigger advantage is that you can alter many of the camera's shooting settings even after you've taken the picture" (Byng 134-5). the raw picture is more versatile and you do a lot of neat effects with them.
Even though it sounds like Raw is better than JPEG pictures, you still need to find a right balance. if you shoot a lot of Raw pictures, then your memory will get filled up fast and JPEG you cant edit the pictures as well. find the balance and you can make great pictures.
Have you tried editing both Raw and JPEG files? If so, what program and what differences have you noticed between editing the two?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete